One Big Beautiful Bill Act: Implications for Site Selection & Economic Development
One Big Beautiful Bill Act: Implications for Site Selection & Economic Development
One Big Beautiful Bill Act: Implications for Site Selection and Economic Development
Key factors impacting site selection, workforce trends, and economic development:
Makes New Markets Tax Credits Permanent
Ending Energy Incentives from the IRA
Updates Opportunity Zones
Pushes Some Funding for Healthcare to States
Could Shift Monies away from Training and Site Readiness
More Aggressive R&D and Real Estate Expensing
Elimination of Deduction for Moving Expenses
Major Opportunity for Supply Chains in Aerospace and Defense
On July 3rd, 2025, U.S. Congress approved a sweeping tax and spending package, informally known as the "Big, Beautiful Bill" or the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 (OBBBA), that marks a dramatic shift in federal fiscal policy. With projected revenue reductions of approximately $4.5 trillion and programmatic spending cuts of $1.2 trillion over ten years, the legislation fundamentally alters the policy landscape in which site selection and economic development strategies are executed.
The bill includes permanent full expensing for capital investments and R&D, reworks the Opportunity Zones program, imposes new limits on state and local tax (SALT) deductions, makes New Markets Tax Credits permanent, and phases out many clean energy incentives established under the Inflation Reduction Act. It also introduces broad changes to Medicaid, SNAP, and other social programs. These provisions carry substantial implications for where and how companies choose to invest - and which regions of the country stand to benefit or lose ground.
This analysis examines the core provisions of the bill, evaluates their likely economic development consequences, and identifies key states and regions that are most directly affected.
Capital Investment and Innovation Incentives
Among the most consequential provisions of the bill are those that permanently allow full expensing of qualified capital equipment and R&D. The legislation enables immediate expensing of new capital property acquired on or after January 19, 2025, and extends similar treatment to domestic R&D expenditures beginning with the 2025 tax year. The bill also introduces enhanced depreciation rules for new production property and expands deductions for export-oriented intellectual property (FDII) and low-taxed intangible income (GILTI).
These changes spur investment in capital-intensive and innovation-driven sectors, including advanced manufacturing, logistics, life sciences, and clean technologies. The provisions sharply reduce the marginal cost of establishing or expanding physical operations in the U.S., incentivizing companies to prioritize domestic siting and accelerating reshoring activity from abroad.
States with robust manufacturing and logistics ecosystems - such as Texas (with over 2.2 million manufacturing jobs), Indiana (home to major automotive and pharmaceutical facilities), Ohio (advanced manufacturing corridors), Michigan (automotive and mobility innovation), and South Carolina (BMW, Boeing, and textile manufacturing) - are well-positioned to capture new investment, particularly where infrastructure and permitting capacity are aligned. Innovation clusters such as North Carolina's Research Triangle Park and Utah's Silicon Slopes tech hub also benefit significantly, especially where complementary state-level innovation credits and university partnerships are sustained.
The Tax Policy Center projects that average household tax reductions of $2,900 annually create additional consumer spending power, further supporting domestic investment incentives. States with shovel-ready industrial real estate, skilled workforce pipelines, and pro-growth regulatory environments see increased project activity and corporate investment interest in the near term.
Place-Based Development Tools
The bill makes permanent and modifies several place-based incentive programs aimed at attracting capital to distressed areas. Most notably, it reforms and extends the Opportunity Zones program and permanently authorizes the New Markets Tax Credit. It also introduces provisions allowing installment-based capital gains payments for farmland sales and offers interest exclusions for certain loans secured by rural or agricultural real estate. A newly expanded $50 billion Rural Health Fund further supports rural infrastructure investment.
These changes drive economic growth in high-need areas that have historically struggled to attract private capital. Regions that benefit most include Appalachia (particularly eastern Kentucky, West Virginia, and southwestern Pennsylvania), the Mississippi Delta (Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi), Tribal lands (especially in Montana, North Dakota, and the Southwest), and the rural Midwest (Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas farming communities). The permanence of Opportunity Zones provides long-term certainty for investors that had been previously lacking.
These place-based programs expand the geography of viable investment locations for industries such as logistics and distribution, precision agriculture and food processing, renewable fuels production, and healthcare services. Rural and secondary markets become increasingly competitive as state and local governments align land, infrastructure, and talent strategies to support emerging demand.
Workforce, Tax Policy, and Talent Mobility
The bill introduces a complex set of provisions affecting individual taxpayers, mobility, and workforce policy. Temporary tax exclusions are granted for overtime pay and tipped income from 2025 to 2028, which increase after-tax earnings for frontline and service-sector workers. At the same time, the bill permanently eliminates the federal deduction for moving expenses (except for military and intelligence workers), and significantly limits most itemized deductions.
Most notably, the bill reinstates a $40,000 cap on the SALT deduction, with the cap reverting to $10,000 in 2030. This change most acutely affects taxpayers in high-tax states such as California, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, and Illinois, where high-income individuals face substantially increased federal tax burdens - particularly those earning over $200,000 annually who previously benefited from unlimited SALT deductions.
These changes influence corporate decisions around headquarters location, executive talent recruitment, and project team mobility. As tax burdens shift, low-tax states such as Florida, Texas, Tennessee, Nevada, and New Hampshire become increasingly attractive locations for headquarters, remote operations, and talent hubs. Conversely, coastal innovation centers face new challenges in retaining or attracting high-income professionals and senior executives.
Companies prioritize tax-friendly, lower-cost locations - particularly for new growth initiatives - while reevaluating their long-term footprint in high-SALT states. Notable examples include expanded corporate campuses in Austin, Miami, Nashville, and Las Vegas, while traditional hubs like San Francisco, Boston, and New York face increased competition for top talent.
Clean Energy Retrenchment and Fossil Fuel Prioritization
The legislation includes sweeping rollbacks of clean energy and climate-related tax incentives introduced under the Inflation Reduction Act. Terminated or phased-out credits include:
Residential solar installation credits (30% federal tax credit eliminated)
Electric vehicle purchase incentives (up to $7,500 credit removed)
Clean hydrogen production credits ($3/kg credit eliminated)
Geothermal heat pump installations
Energy-efficient home construction credits
Commercial building energy efficiency improvements
Additionally, the bill rescinds funding for dozens of climate, resilience, and decarbonization initiatives, totaling approximately $200 billion in previously allocated resources.
At the same time, the bill expands fossil fuel development by mandating new lease sales for coal, oil, and gas on federal lands, lowering royalty rates from 12.5% to 8%, and streamlining environmental reviews. It also delays methane emissions penalties until 2030 and modifies the tax treatment of intangible drilling costs to accelerate depletion allowances.
States with strong fossil fuel industries - Texas (leading oil and gas production), Louisiana (petrochemical processing), Oklahoma (energy infrastructure), North Dakota (Bakken shale), and Wyoming (coal and natural gas) - benefit from renewed investment in extraction, processing, and energy infrastructure. In contrast, clean energy leaders such as California, Colorado, Oregon, and New York face a cooling effect as federal supports are withdrawn and project economics are upended.
The energy transition slows significantly, and states previously reliant on clean energy momentum revise their economic development strategies. Clean tech companies shift focus to international markets or to U.S. states that maintain strong state-level green incentive programs, such as California's Self-Generation Incentive Program and New York's Clean Energy Fund.
Medicaid, SNAP, and Social Spending Cuts
The bill includes over $600 billion in reductions to public health and social safety net programs over ten years. These include the elimination of enhanced Medicaid funding for expansion states, tighter eligibility verification rules, provider reimbursement caps, and new work requirements for both Medicaid and SNAP beneficiaries. A portion of these savings is redirected to a new $50 billion rural health fund intended to stabilize rural hospitals.
These changes place additional pressure on Medicaid expansion states, particularly those with high enrollment rates such as California (13.5 million enrollees), New York (7.2 million), Michigan (2.9 million), and Pennsylvania (3.1 million). Public health systems in those states see reductions in federal support, potentially impacting hospital systems, community health investments, and the feasibility of locating healthcare-related facilities in certain geographies.
Healthcare and life sciences companies increasingly scrutinize state-level health infrastructure and funding stability as part of their location selection process. Rural hospitals in non-expansion states receive new lifelines through the rural health fund - but only if local leaders can successfully compete for limited resources through competitive grant processes administered by HHS.
Defense, Aerospace, and Strategic Infrastructure
The bill provides significant new investment in national defense, space, and strategic industrial capacity. It allocates over $125 billion for shipbuilding, air and missile defense, Indo-Pacific operations, and modernization of nuclear forces. Additionally, it authorizes $10 billion in funding for national space programs and $24 billion for munitions and weapons production.
These investments benefit states with major defense installations, aerospace manufacturing hubs, and logistics corridors. Key beneficiaries include:
Virginia (Newport News Shipbuilding, Norfolk Naval Base, Pentagon corridor)
Alabama (Huntsville Space and Rocket Center, Redstone Arsenal)
Mississippi (Ingalls Shipbuilding, Stennis Space Center)
California (aerospace manufacturing, defense contractors)
Florida (Space Coast operations, MacDill AFB, Indo-Pacific logistics)
Texas (Fort Hood, aerospace manufacturing, defense contracting)
Defense-aligned industries have greater incentives to invest in locations with clear federal procurement ties, specialized talent pools, and proximity to military infrastructure. The legislation's "Buy American" provisions further encourage domestic defense manufacturing investment.
Implementation Timeline and Regional Impacts
The legislation's implementation occurs in phases:
2025: Capital expensing provisions take effect, SALT cap reinstated
2026: Clean energy credit phase-outs begin, Medicaid changes implemented
2027: Rural health fund fully operational, defense spending ramp-up
2028: Overtime/tip tax exclusions expire unless extended
2030: SALT cap reverts to $10,000, methane penalties resume
States positioned to benefit most from rapid implementation include Texas, Florida, Tennessee, and North Dakota, which combine favorable tax environments with strong infrastructure capacity. States facing the greatest adjustment challenges include California, New York, and Illinois, which must navigate both reduced federal support and increased tax burdens on high earners.
Conclusion
The "Big, Beautiful Bill" marks a fundamental reorientation of federal tax and spending policy - with significant consequences for how and where business investment occurs in the United States. The bill tilts heavily toward capital investment, favors rural and fossil fuel-rich regions, and shifts many public cost burdens from the federal government to the states.
Regions with the capacity to align quickly with the new policy landscape - through tax incentives, permitting reform, infrastructure readiness, and workforce development - gain a competitive advantage. Conversely, high-cost states, clean energy hubs, and social-service-dependent regions must adapt rapidly to preserve economic momentum.
For corporate leaders, site selectors, and economic developers, this moment demands fresh analysis and strategic recalibration. The incentive environment has changed fundamentally - and so must the map of U.S. economic opportunity. Success in this new landscape requires understanding not just where tax advantages exist, but where infrastructure, talent, and regulatory environments can support rapid business growth in an era of federal fiscal constraint.
To learn more about how this may impact your business, sign up below and a member of our team will be in touch.